How Rights to Light are Established in Law

Rights to light are private property rights that protect a building’s access to sufficient natural illumination through specific apertures, typically windows. In England and Wales they sit within the law of easements, so they bind land and can be enforced against successors in title. In practice, they influence massing, façade design and the commercial viability of development, and they underpin many of the negotiations surveyors lead between dominant and servient owners. This guide sets out, in plain English, how rights to light are established in law, how they can be prevented, and how courts deal with infringements. It draws on current professional guidance and leading legal texts so you can rely on it when shaping a strategy.

1) What is a right to light?

What is a right to light? It's a private, legally enforceable easement to a minimum level of natural illumination through a defined aperture in a building. It is not a planning concept, and it is distinct from daylight and sunlight assessments under BRE 209. A right to light benefits a dominant building, and burdens servient land over which light passes. It protects buildings, not open land, gardens or general amenity. As with other easements, the right may arise by grant, implication, or long use.

In technical practice, surveyors model the baseline and post-development illuminance to determine whether the proposed massing would reduce light below a level considered sufficient for comfortable or beneficial use, judged by the ordinary notions of mankind. That sufficiency standard has long roots in case law and remains the touchstone in expert reporting and court decisions.

2) The legal character: an easement appurtenant to a building

Rights to light are easements. They are proprietary rights, not personal licences, so they generally run with land and bind successors. They benefit buildings and the apertures within them. A defined dominant building receives the benefit, and defined servient land carries the burden. This differs from most other easements in that the right protects passive receipt of light, not a right to do something on another’s land. The easement cannot exist for open ground; it must attach to a building and a defined aperture such as a window or skylight.

Several consequences flow from this:

The benefit will usually pass automatically on a sale or grant of a lease of the dominant building, unless expressly excluded.

The aperture matters. Alterations, blocking up, moving, or replacing windows can affect the right, and redevelopment can transfer rights where new windows sit in substantially the same position. These are factual, technical, and legal questions an expert should address early.

3) How rights to light are established in law

There are four main ways to acquire a right to light:

a) Express grant or reservation

Parties can create a right to light expressly by deed. On a split of land, one party may reserve or grant rights to the other. Title investigation and deed interpretation are essential to confirm the grant’s scope, any exclusions, and whether tenants benefit.

b) Implied easements

Courts may imply a right to light on a disposition where the circumstances demand it, including under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows and by section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. These mechanisms often apply where a common owner sells part, and the part sold or retained includes windows that have been enjoying light over the retained or transferred land. Implied rights depend on necessity, intention, or continuous and apparent quasi-easements at the date of the grant, and require careful legal and factual analysis.

c) Prescription at common law or under the doctrine of lost modern grant

Long and uninterrupted enjoyment as of right can establish an easement by prescription. The lost modern grant doctrine presumes a historic grant after 20 years’ qualifying use. Its application to rights of light reflects the peculiarities of “passive” use, and it operates alongside statutory prescription.

d) Statutory prescription under the Prescription Act 1832

Section 3 of the 1832 Act provides a statutory route to acquire a right to light after 20 years’ uninterrupted enjoyment “as of right,” through a defined aperture in a building. The period must be continuous to the commencement of an action or interruption. The Act’s drafting is notoriously awkward, but the 20-year rule remains the main plank of prescriptive acquisition in practice.

Key qualifiers for prescription

Use must be without force, without secrecy, and without permission.

Interruption for one year after notice can defeat accrual.

Unity of ownership or possession can stop time running.

Tenants may acquire rights over a landlord’s servient land in some circumstances, another quirk of light.

4) Preventing rights from being established

Developers and estate managers often seek to prevent prescriptive accrual where future redevelopment is contemplated.

a) Light Obstruction Notices under the Rights of Light Act 1959

A registered Light Obstruction Notice (LON) operates like a notional screen. It is a statutory mechanism to interrupt the running of the 20-year period without building a physical hoarding. If unchallenged, it stops time for prescription. If challenged, a tribunal or court can determine the matter. The process has strict form and registration requirements and should be handled by experienced advisers.

b) Express covenants and title controls

Parties regularly use mutual rights of light agreements, restrictive covenants, or lease clauses to avoid accrual, manage risk, and preserve development potential across an estate. Surveyors should flag these instruments at heads-of-terms stage to avoid expensive surprises later.

5) Establishing the dominant building and apertures

Because the easement protects sufficient light to a building through a defined aperture, the survey and model must identify:

the dominant building and each relevant window or skylight,

the servient land over which light passes,

any historic window positions that may carry transferred rights,

and any alterations that might amount to abandonment.

Greenhouses, winter gardens and rooflights can enjoy rights of light if they are buildings with apertures. The law does not protect open land. Doors that are not glazed are not apertures for light, while glazed doors can be. Atrium glazing and curtain walling can also be apertures for rights analysis. These details influence any claim and the remedy sought.

6) The standard protected: “sufficiency” not “unchanged light”

The legal test is not whether any diminution occurs. The right protects sufficient natural light for the comfortable use of a dwelling, or the beneficial use and occupation of a commercial building, judged by ordinary notions of mankind. That principle controls whether an infringement is actionable and informs the court’s choice of remedy. Technical methods like the Waldram approach are commonly used to express sufficiency in practice, and while courts are not bound to any single metric, they expect sound, transparent expert evidence.

7) Remedies when an established right is infringed

a) Injunction is the primary remedy

Traditionally, a final injunction restraining or removing the offending mass is the primary remedy for substantial infringements, though the court has discretion. The old Shelfer tests guided when to award damages in lieu, but after Coventry v Lawrence the court surveys all the circumstances, including seriousness of injury, conduct, delay, and the public interest. Developers cannot assume they can “pay their way out” of a right to light.

b) Damages: diminution in value and negotiating damages

Where the court declines an injunction, it may award damages. In modern practice, courts often assess negotiating damages that reflect what reasonable parties would have agreed for the voluntary release of the right at the time of breach, rather than a purely arithmetic diminution in value. Expert valuation evidence and the development economics commonly come into play.

c) Interim injunctions and undertakings

A claimant who seeks an interim injunction pre-trial must give an undertaking in damages, so surveyors should brief clients that an unsuccessful bid could expose them to the developer’s losses for delay. Case strategy and Part 36 offers should be coordinated with solicitors.

8) Public bodies and section 203 HPA 2016

Public authorities exercising section 203 of the Housing and Planning Act 2016 can override rights to light where land has been appropriated for planning purposes, converting claims into compensation rather than injunctive relief. This tool is narrow in scope and tightly scrutinised, but it sits in the modern toolbox where strategic regeneration or significant public benefit is demonstrated.

9) Professional practice: how surveyors establish and defend rights

The current RICS professional standard (effective 1 June 2024) sets clear expectations:

Instructions and brief: define scope, accuracy, data sources, and assumptions at the outset, and distinguish rights to light from planning daylight/sunlight.

Research: title, deeds, historic imagery, leases, and estate arrangements to map potential grants, reservations, and prescriptive accrual.

Measurement and modelling: accuracy commensurate with risk; declare limitations where relying on third-party or non-surveyed context.

Negotiation: most right to light disputes settle; negotiation and structured protocols reduce cost and delay.

10) Practical Scenarios : How Rights to Light are Established in Law

New massing near historic apertures: A terrace with long-standing sash windows will likely have accrued rights. Early envelope testing and sensitive façade design can retain sufficiency and avoid claims. If not, expect release negotiations or design mitigation.

Redevelopment of the dominant building: If you demolish and rebuild, do historic window positions transfer their rights to new windows in substantially the same position, or have you abandoned them by moving apertures or altering layouts The answer is fact-specific and legally nuanced, so document the chronology and design rationale and take coordinated legal advice.

Estate-wide strategy: Institutional landowners often implement mutual covenants and use LONs to arrest accrual, preserving future flexibility while avoiding physical hoardings. Timetabling matters.

Funding and insurance: Lenders now expect a clear right to light risk narrative, including options analysis, likely remedies, and whether an injunction risk can be managed by design, settlement, or in limited cases by s.203 strategies. Rights to light insurance can de-risk residual exposures in a negotiated strategy.

11) Checklist: How Rights to Light are Established in Law

Identify the apertures and confirm the building qualifies as a dominant building. Gather plans, surveys, and photos.

Trace title for express grants, reservations, or exclusions.

Analyse implication: Was there a common ownership split Did section 62 LPA 1925 or Wheeldon principles likely operate at the time

Assess prescription: Establish the 20-year timeline, any interruptions, permissions, or unity periods, and potential tenant-landlord nuances.

Check for LONs, restrictive covenants, estate agreements, and public law overrides.

Model sufficiency and propose mitigation or negotiation strategy aligned to likely remedies.

FAQs: How Rights to Light are Established in Law

Q1. What is the single most common way rights to light are established
A. By prescription after 20 years’ uninterrupted, as-of-right enjoyment of light through a defined aperture under section 3 of the Prescription Act 1832, often evidenced through historic photography and plans.

Q2. Can a tenant acquire a right to light against their landlord
A. Yes, unusually for easements, a tenant may in some circumstances acquire a prescriptive right over the landlord’s servient land. Check lease provisions and timing carefully.

Q3. Does any reduction in light amount to an infringement
A. No. The law protects sufficiency of natural light for comfortable or beneficial use, not perfect preservation of the status quo. Minor, non-actionable reductions occur frequently.

Q4. Do gardens or open yards ever get rights to light
A. No. The right attaches to buildings and defined apertures. Open land is not protected by a light easement, though planning daylight/sunlight policy or covenants may still be relevant.

Q5. How do you stop a neighbour accruing a right to light
A. Serve and register a Light Obstruction Notice under the 1959 Act to interrupt time, or use tailored covenants. Physical screens can also interrupt, but LONs avoid site disruption.

Q6. If my building is rebuilt, do old rights carry over
A. Possibly, if new apertures are in the same or substantially the same positions as before. Alterations can risk abandonment or require fresh accrual. Document positions precisely.

Q7. Will a court always order damages instead of stopping a scheme
A. No. An injunction remains the primary remedy for serious infringements. Damages in lieu are discretionary, assessed on all the circumstances after Coventry v Lawrence.

Q8. Does planning permission defeat a rights to light claim
A. No. Planning and private rights operate in parallel. Permission may inform public interest factors, but it does not extinguish a private easement.

Q9. When should we raise right to light on a project
A. At feasibility. Early envelope testing can steer design to non-injurious massing, reduce ransom risk, and preserve viability before planning submission.

Q10. Can a public authority override rights to light
A. In limited cases, yes, via section 203 HPA 2016 once land is properly appropriated for planning purposes, converting injunctive risk to compensation. This is exceptional and should be justified on public interest grounds.

Key takeaways

Think easement: a building, a defined aperture, and a servient route for light.

Establish rights via grant, implication, or 20-year prescription; stop accrual with LONs.

The legal test is sufficiency. Design to retain it and you reduce risk.

Injunction risk is real. Do not assume money solves every case.

Need Expert Advice?

At Anstey Horne, our specialist surveyors have extensive experience advising developers, property owners, and legal teams across the UK. We help identify risks, negotiate solutions, and ensure your project progresses with confidence. Speak to our Rights to Light surveyors to discuss how we can help resolve any Rights to Light concerns.

For more information on how rights to light are established in Law, and how they are measured and defended, please see our Fact Sheet, and for a collection of articles on all aspect of this service see our blog.

For advice on rights to light direct from one of our surveyors, please call our Rights to Light Enquiry Line on 020 4534 3138.

If you’d like us to call you, please fill in our Contact Us form and we will call you back.